Home      Subscribe (free)    All Articles

The Box Travels

Ballot
Mail-in ballots are the easy mark

There Will Be Cheating in the 2026 Election

We’ve already seen cheating in the 2026 primary contests. Look at Alaska, where Democrats went to extraordinary lengths to find a Republican challenger to unseat the incumbent Republican Senator in the Republican primary. They did this by convincing a retired teacher named Dan Sullivan to register as a Republican and challenge incumbent Republican Senator Dan Sullivan. Confused? That’s the intent. These guys have the same name. The goal of the Democrat party in Alaska is to confuse enough Republican voters to vote for the wrong Dan Sullivan and split the Republican vote, allowing the Democrat candidate to eke out a win.

In New Jersey, Democrat governor Mikie Sherrill was forced to admit that “dirty” voter rolls in that state contain 6,600 illegal aliens. On top of that, an additional 250,000+ non-citizens have been identified by DHS as being registered to vote in federal elections in California, Pennsylvania, and Nevada.

New Jersey, Minnesota, California, and Michigan continue to refuse to send the federal government statistics on the number of ineligible voters purged from their respective databases. Why the reluctance?

80% of the public wants the requirement of a photo ID to vote (or at least to register to vote) in federal elections. This percentage is so high that it must include at least half of all Democrat voters. It is the central tenant of the “SAVE America” act which congressional Democrats have been adamantly opposed to even considering.

Interestingly, for all the talk among progressives about preserving “democracy” and the “voice of the people”, they are absolutely ignoring the voice of the people (which includes a significant number of their ideological ilk) on this topic. It is the clearest case yet where elected Democrats in Congress are directly defying the will of their own constituents.

Twenty-four states have sued the federal government to stop a new postal service rule that would verify, via optical bar codes on envelopes, that mail ballots go to their intended recipients and are received back from only those recipients on or before election day.

This is not an oppressive or draconian rule. However, Democrat controlled states throughout the country are spending tens of millions of dollars in legal proceedings trying to prevent this simple rule from being applied. Radical leftist judges, whose rational decision-making ability has been compromised by a maniacal contempt for Donald Trump, are aiding Democrats in this regard whenever possible.

Why are Democrats putting so much time, money, and energy into resisting these safeguards? If our election system is already working so well (as they claim), with no cheating of any significance occurring, then the result of this election should be exactly the same with or without all the above safeguards in place. Why then, if they wouldn’t make any difference, is there so much Democrat opposition to installing these safeguards?

It’s because the Democrats want to cheat. A lack of positive voter ID, and weak or absent checks on the eligibility of mail-in ballots, are necessary prerequisites for their preferred methods of cheating.1 There is no other reasonable conclusion.

Currently, twenty-six U.S. states do not require a photo ID to vote. Astonishingly, fourteen of those states require no ID of any kind to cast a vote. It should come as no surprise that every one of those fourteen states is under Democrat control.

Mail-in ballots are a particularly soft target. Thanks to COVID, mail-in ballots accounted for nearly half (42%) of all ballots cast in the 2020 election. That represented more than double the number of mail-in ballots cast in the 2016 election. In the two subsequent national elections after COVID (2022 and 2024), the percentage of mail-in ballots has remained well above pre-pandemic levels. Why? Because Democrat states now encourage mail-in voting given how easily it lends itself to malfeasance.

Since we know the Democrats are doing everything possible to prepare to cheat, the next question is why do they think they need to cheat? After all, the major news media and nearly all pollsters are predicting a Democrat takeover of the House and several key pickups, if not an outright takeover, in the Senate. If the election is already heading the Democrats way without any cheating, then why would they take the risk?

We believe the polls are not reflecting the true political reality, and the Democrats are actually in some trouble. Internally, they likely know this and realize they’re stuck with a slate of extremely poor candidates. Many of those candidates are pushing a socialist agenda which most of the country (71%) rejects. Therefore, it stands to reason that the only way for them to salvage a win in the real world would be to cheat.

So be ready to endure more of the same thing we saw in 2020 and in the just concluded 2026 primaries. Bags of mail-in ballots showing up very late at night or early the next morning after election day with 90% of those late arriving ballots magically cast for the Democrat candidate. Also be ready for that very familiar scenario of the Republican candidate leading in the vote count late into election night and then being tied or slightly behind the next morning. Lastly, expect again that some blue states will literally take weeks to count all their votes, especially for local elections, with results slowly shifting toward the Democrat candidate during that time.

It’s no longer a question of if there will be cheating in this election. The only question is if there will be enough cheating to change the results.

1 (These are just a few examples) States with no voter ID requirement can easily be subject to people masquerading as a registered voter either to vote more than once or to enable non-citizens to cast a ballot. All they have to do is arrive at the polling station prior to the person they are pretending to be. Unsolicited mail-in ballots can be returned by anyone using the name of a registered voter without their knowledge. This can easily be accomplished in large numbers since voter registration records are public records in most states.

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *