If Biden Won, then ..

This is a big f**king deal.  – Joe Biden

Now that the electoral college has voted, and the Supreme Court has declined to hear the main Republican case alleging election fraud, we are supposed to accept the outcome of the 2020 election. We are to believe that the results from Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, Arizona, and Georgia are valid and there was no cheating of any consequence that could possibly have changed the result.

If this is truly the case, then we must also accept the following:

• Joe Biden legitimately received over 14 million more votes than Hillary Clinton did in 2016. That is more than all the votes Clinton received in 2016 from California and New York combined.
• Republican candidates for lower offices won big at the federal, state, and local levels all across the country despite the fact that Joe Biden prevailed in 6 of the 8 battleground states and received 7 million more votes than Trump nationwide. This can’t be the result of Trump-weary Republicans voting for Biden because Trump himself received 12 million more votes than he did in 2016. It is also extremely unlikely that legions of Biden voters chose Republican candidates for all the lower offices on their ballot. There is only one other possible explanation for this result – millions of votes had to have been cast for Joe Biden only, without those ballots being marked for any other lower office candidates. This aberrant phenomenon, on an immense scale, was evident in nearly every battleground state.

These aren’t the only statistical irregularities found in the 2020 voter data, but they are the most telling. The news media, even the most conservative, has no reasonable explanation as to how these things could have occurred in a straight-up legitimate election. Most of the media are simply ignoring these statistical anomalies as if they don’t require any explaining. The narrative is that people genuinely voted this way.

For arguments sake, let’s suppose they did. Does the visual evidence, widely seen by many with their own eyes in the months before the election, support the outcome of a Biden win? Trump had super-sized attendance at his many rallies (despite COVID-19) as well as hundreds of spontaneous events like boat parades, marches, car and motorcycle caravans, all organically generated and most taking place without Trump’s presence. By comparison there was no visual evidence of any appreciable public support for Joe Biden. There were no impromptu events of the sort we saw for Trump. Scant attendance was seen on the very few occasions in which Biden came out and spoke. And when he did speak, his speech was riddled with mispronunciations, garbled expression, and obvious contradictions to his own past statements. He had to walk back elements of his initial campaign at head-turning speed. He reversed positions he first endorsed, like defunding the police, fracking, packing the Supreme Court, ending the filibuster, raising taxes, and adding two new states (D.C. and Puerto Rico) after finding how unpopular they were in the country at large. To say the least, he was not a candidate who engendered enthusiasm or encouraged spontaneous support.

Then there was the matter of Biden’s son Hunter. It was painfully obvious well before the election that Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings and personal behavior were attracting a portion of the news cycle at the expense of his father. Biden’s team argued that their candidate couldn’t be held responsible for his adult son’s conduct, and that Hunter was being smeared by fake news. This was to be written off as a mere distraction. Then, evidence of financial payouts involving Joe Biden himself began to surface. Recall the infamous email recovered from Hunter Biden’s laptop describing the distribution of money from a foreign business deal – “10 held by H for the big guy?”. And we have just recently learned that the Justice Department has been engaged in a grand jury investigation of Hunter Biden since 2018.  This was not disclosed until after the election.

During the latter part of the campaign, Biden stayed home and was virtually invisible. At the same time, Trump campaigned in multiple cities everyday attracting gigantic enthusiastic crowds each place he went. These pre-election visuals gave the unmistakable impression of enormous public support for Trump and little interest in Biden. Even the overwhelming media bias against Trump and for Biden couldn’t hide the contrast. We think the pre-election truth was that there was even stronger public support for Trump and less enthusiasm for Biden. The media tried their best to obscure this. To rationalize this contrast in energy and visible support with the election results, we must postulate a very large “silent” vote for Joe Biden. This ostensibly made up for the huge gap of pre-election enthusiasm we all saw when Biden’s campaign and Trump’s campaign were compared.

Think about that for a minute. A silent majority for Joe Biden? This runs completely counter to the personality of the typical progressive liberal seen marching in protests, defacing statues, combating police, looting businesses, and glorifying ANTIFA. Progressive voters can be characterized in many ways, but “silent” is not at the top of anyone’s list.

A comparison to the 2016 election is instructive. In the months leading up to the 2016 election, Trump had massive support at his events and rallies while Hillary Clinton had little by comparison. This precisely parallels the situation we just experienced here in 2020. Yet there were no extraordinary statistical anomalies in the presidential vote tallies in 2016. Nor was there any evidence of a huge “silent” vote for Hillary Clinton. We did not find millions of ballots cast only for Clinton and no other down-ballot candidates. Since no statistical evidence impugned the integrity of the physical voting process in 2016, the Democrats and the media created and latched onto a tale of “Russian interference”. Not just any kind of interference. The Dems declared endlessly that mind control by way of fake Facebook and Twitter postings caused just enough people to lose their minds and vote for Trump to carry the election. If this were true, and the Russians were really that good and stealthy at getting Trump elected, what happened in 2020? Did the Russians just sit this one out? Notice how there hasn’t been one peep about Russian involvement of any kind in the 2020 election.

While the statistical and anecdotal evidence of election fraud in 2020 is strong, Trump’s legal team has found to their dismay that this evidence has been useless in a courtroom in a case of such great import. Judges need to see the explicit mechanism of the fraud, who the ringleaders were, and the exact number of suspect votes. Otherwise, the remedy is ill-defined and the main perpetrator nameless. This is the primary reason most of the Trump’s fraud lawsuits have been thrown out or left unheard. For all practical purposes, the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the consolidated fraud case brought by the state of Texas ended any legal pathway that could change the outcome of the election.¹

It is not surprising that so many people, politicians and citizens alike, are not accepting the 2020 Presidential election outcome as valid. Nor should we. The numbers simply don’t add up.

We will survive a Biden-Harris presidency (which we suspect will quickly evolve into a Harris presidency). The Republican position in the House has greatly improved to near parity. If a Republican wins just one of the two Senatorial run-off elections in Georgia (Jan 5, 2021), the Republicans retain control of the Senate. A solidly conservative Supreme Court will thwart any extra-Constitutional laws or executive orders. Also, infighting within the ideologically split Democrat party will hinder socialist style legislation coming out of this administration.

However, the mechanisms of fraud that have clearly occurred in the 2020 election must be eradicated in advance of the 2022 mid-terms and 2024 Presidential election. If not, the country will continue to tumble down the slippery slope of habitually invalid, corrupt elections, just as in any banana republic. This can and must be fixed at the state level. To that end, the terrible governance we see now in many states (Oregon, Washington state, New York, California, Michigan) must be replaced with leadership motivated to evolve their election laws and systems to have unassailable integrity. That must begin with a voter identification requirement which, astonishingly, is currently absent in 18 states. Without this, the odious progressive socialist agenda will rapidly accelerate its momentum. This is a much bigger threat to the USA than COVID-19.

¹ This does not mean that all the Constitutional challenges to the validity of the election have been exhausted. Keep in mind that even though the electoral college has now voted, those votes are not yet official. They will only become official when the electoral votes are formally counted on January 6^th during a joint session of Congress. Several Republicans have already signaled there will be challenges brought during the official counting of these votes as is permitted by the Constitution. We will have to wait to see how that scenario plays out.